1.
Evidence this year (2005) of damage to human health and
families being driven from their homes by the damage to health from base station
emissions. Received by Gill Lyden
Dear
(Deleted for Data protection), Luton.
We
do not live there anymore. In the end we had to abandon our home (and place of
work, means we were there 24 hours a day/7 days/week, 365 days/year ) The house is still standing empty 1½ years later. Why I
wonder.
I
still miss my house awfully.
But we did get lots of measurements on the Com monitor. With the mast
only 28 meters away, our Com monitor lit up like a Xmas tree. (see attached photo, all lights are lit to the top of the
scale). (Sorry.I do not have the photo.
G.Lyden)
But
the thing is that UMTS is a Sinister
thing. It is not the deadly silent radiation of GSM. It is very
noisy indeed and probably even more deadly than
GSM. I first found out about
the noise when they shut the mast down for repairs on the 180804 and then again
on the 010904. It was like coming into the “EYE” of a Tornado, suddenly it was
totally quiet after the raging storm.
Erik
measured and there was no radiation. And then suddenly it all started again, and
I felt physically that they had turned it on again, Erik measured and it was on
again.
But
the worst thing is, that we made a lot of effort to shield for the radiation,
and managed to shield it away, but still, sitting in the spots where the beams
came into the house we fainted and lost consciousness. There is still a big mark
in the carpet of our TV room where my hot iron fell on the floor and melted the
carpet fibre. We were very lucky that the carpet did
not ignite and burn the house down, because we only came to quite a while later,
and the room was full of fumes from the melted
carpet.
I
have never been so scared in my whole life.
Dr.
Gerald Hyland went into the house just before our case came to court and
measured with his Acousticom, and he said that he had
never heard the Acousticom screech like this before.
It was the highest reading he had ever had.
Best
regards. Agnes.
P.S.
I have now moved us to a place almost at the top of the “Mountain”
-----Original
Message-----From: (deleted for Data protection) On Behalf Of
Mobile Phone Mast Campaigners Networking Email List
Sent:
Subject: Re: [Mast Network] Zamir
tested various window films
hi
Agnes I read with interest your efforts to reduce levels of radiation in your
home. I understand that you also use a com monitor as the basis
for measuring relative levels of radiation in your
home.
I
have a com monitor and used it in the past and found that its lowest
reading of 0.7 volts per metre is not sensitive enough for the
purposes of effective radiation reduction. In the end our
group was fortunate enough to acquire a very sensitive home built
acousticom type that is frequency selective.to use in our quest for reduced
radiation exposures. We were able to assess the radiation levels
of each different frequency present and deal with each frequency in
turn.
2
At
least 2 serious studies ( one was pulsed and the other was non
pulsed) indicate health effects at levels as low as 0.3 volts per metre and
as that level might not register on the com monitor you might still have
such levels of radiation in your home that might
be bio interactive.
2
We
have experimented with progressive shielding for some years now and are
familiar with the immense technical challenge of keeping radiation away
from people and have found that as the level of exposure is progressively
lowered to the point that our very sensitive acousticom type
meter does not register emissions that the health of the exposed subjects
seems to progressively improve. Well being is a subjective factor and the
criteria for assessing well being is productivity, earnings, days off work,
looking after grandchildren, energy for home improvement projects gardening
visits to doctors etc.
Perhaps
you might need to get more sensitive instruments and go over your home and see
if there might still be radiation leaking in despite your recent
efforts.
best
wishes
(Deleted
for Data protection)
-----
Original Message -----
To: “
“
“ Sent:
Subject:
Re: [Mast Network] Zamir tested various window films Zamir. Did
you by any chance check it against UMTS or Tetra rays? When we put alu-foil and
steel netting on the inside of all our walls, and lead curtain netting before
the windows, our com monitor did not measure radiation, but we still got sick,
in the same spots as we had measured the radiation in. So we think it must have
been the frequencies. There
is something deeply sinister about the frequencies UMTS sends out, and the worst
part is that is very much worse when there is no traffic on the net. We had
thought it was because of heavy traffic, but found out the hard way, it was the
opposite. Can it be that the traffic disguises the pulsing when there is
traffic, but when there is no traffic the pulsing is undisguised and the
frequency beams really get into you. It got so bad we
fainted. I am going to send you a letter my son
Henrik has sent me. He has been working hard to find an explanation why, UMTS is
so terrible. He is reading material on Radiation protection for Mobile phones
from a manufacturer of the protection chip and tells me there is a lot in there
to explain the reason for the
effects on people. Best
regards. Agnes