* Mobile phone Class
Action Lawsuit in the USA - Urgent Response to Sianette Kwee - New
Israeli Study-Cell Phone is a germ host - Gro Brundtland on RF radiation
- Practical Censorship in “official” health information
- Facing a remote control future? - Chemtrails of the World - Not
just warmer: it's the hottest for 2,000 years - Central America's
Environmental Decline - Species Extinction (14/10/03)
phone Class Action Lawsuit in the USA
Portable radio-damaged citizens of the Federal Republic of Germany
now the possibility of suing portable radio operators via the
payment of damages and/or compensations in Germany. The principle
simple: Several plaintiffs are litigating representatively for
of further concerned. The met decision applies to everyone,
sum is divided. Possible is a complaint in the USA if
enterprise in the USA has financial interests there. This might
in any case if shares are acted there or participations in US
enterprises are held. Advantage of the procedure: economically
court fees in the USA), as a rule, no cost carrying obligation
case of defeat.
The taken over lawyer agency in the USA is the one from attorney
Middleton from the law office Suggs, Kelly & Middleton in
Georgia. The law office is engaged for over 20 years in
the consumer protection. Closer information is callable in the
under http://www.suggskelly.com <http://www.suggskelly.com/
Attorney Middleton had already cases of asbestos before court,
which he represented up to 5000 persons (one calls legal proceedings
with a large number of humans with the same problem in the USA
Action Cases”), also schools participated. From the agrarian
had cases of air and water pollution and cases of lead and tungsten
carbide poisonings with children. His law firm consists of 15
With the network of attorney Middleton there are good chances
represent successfully the interests of the affected.
German connecting lawyer to attorney Middleton is attorney Lutz
Rheinstr. 2, 76532 Baden-Baden, phone 004972 21 99 23 90, fax
99 23 91.
To the fee: in the USA another system of lawyer rewards exists
class-action-lawsuits (only on success fee basis). In the case
successful, nothing is charged. If a fee is determined, the
approve it. It can be up to 25% of the gained sum. With comparisons
of the court, individually also 35-40% can be determined. The
main case risk is at the law office Suggs, Kelly & Middleton.
possible appeal proceedings, the risk of costs is at the law
Suggs, Kelly & Middleton. The cause of action are obsolescence
properties, houses and agricultural assets. Proofs can be furnished
consultants, e.g. the obsolescence by mobile basis stations
can be rated
from them and/or by the ring of German brokers where already
brokers regard portable radio plants as obsolescence, concerning
sale and the letting of real estate. In addition it comes to
houses/buildings are becoming possibly uninhabitable and/or
usable in the originally foreseen form, e.g. kindergarten, school,
agricultural property, farmers can claim also obsolescence for
and yard (indirect damages with animals: the animal is exposed
radiation on property = obsolescence.
Also shielding costs of the house or the freehold flat can be
There is an objective obsolescence (= measurably) and there
is a felt
obsolescence. This is also to complain.
If the mobile phone radio transmitter is visible, this already
hold back potential buyers = obsolescence. Even if the
antenna does not
send yet this is a case of obsolescence, it can go on transmission
already tomorrow. If antennas are planned, but not yet working,
case of obsolescence is present. Attorney Middleton recommends
case to participate therefore preventively in the complaint.
Attorney Middleton suggests addressing also the neighbours and
them to take part in this lawsuit. If necessary it would be
conceivable for concerned persons to underwrite neighbours.
Austrians and Swiss and other injured persons from other countries
participate also in the class-action-lawsuit. If American
have their land properties in Germany or in other foreign countries,
would participate in the lawsuit, this would continue to rise
success of the complaint.
To the distance range of the antenna, starting from which one
the complaint, attorney Middleton says: "You can see the tower!
Since it is condition-legally illegal that the lawyers take
external costs (consultant, translator etc..), only for these
advance payment would have to be contributed. One assumes approx.
persons will take part in the procedure. From the lawyers it
a limitation of costs with 50.000,00 Euro altogether for all
all participants. If more persons should take part, a proportionate
amount is returned. If less than 250 persons take part, the
procedure is agreed upon with all mandators. If the procedure
can not be
continued, the deposited amount is refunded. Likewise remaining
contributions are returned back. A trust account was opened.
The above passage of the costs limitation on altogether 50,000
all instances for all participants is a new fact and is noted
certificate of authority of the attorneys expressly. This passage
be achieved by intensive negotiations with the attorneys and
costs for all participants altogether with 50.000 Euro for all
Important it is therefore that as much as possible take part.
number of plaintiffs means: it is more to complain and it develops
costs for the particular. So it is possible to represent a great
affected. That is the procedure with a “good” case,
i.e. a US lawyer
will get involved in the substantial process risk of costs (possibly
some hundred thousand US dollars) only, if the chances stand
well to win
the process. More under:
Response to Sianette Kwee
Sianette Kwee has asked for suggestions for the TV show,
should be said about the WHO if it comes up- I beg you
to bring the WHO
issue up, and not wait for someone else to bring it up,
start to cite the WHO's "safe" standard and you will not have
react. It should be brought up anyway in my opinion- The
WHO is the
main body that is responsible in a direct way: All the
the world act by directions that come from the top
body- the WHO-they
cite the WHO's reports for their public health policy, it's
reference. The standards, everything. Especially Europe as the
WHO is a
european body. The WHO is responsible for the health of
the people in
the world. How does it look like, that the person who
is the main
player in this issue, Dr. Michael Repacholi, found
2.4 fold icrease in
lymphoma in rats exopsed to GSM phone radiation - the same one
danish children use heavily- and kept the results silent for
because he was funded by Telstra, the biggest australian cellular
company? How does it look like when he said that "it's only
instead of warning the public? How does it look like that
he said to
the australian senatte that he thinks it was an non-heat effect?
will give you the source if you need), How does it looks like
said that the worst effect of the cellular phone is that it
meals at the restaurants? (microwave news). I think this subject
be brought up in every country in the world on public T.V,
and I ask
now, what I think is the most important thing here: How
does it look
like if we don't raise this issue up- publically? To know this
up? I think it's a very big mistake to ignore it.
Every person should
know this as common knowledge: To understand who are the
pull the strings of our lives, and to ask- How can we
allow them to
control us? This is simply making a joke from all the world
It should be discussed openly in nations, on T.V. I think
surprise many people with these facts, even some of the
come to the discussion.
Israeli Study-Cell Phone is a germ host
"Yes, it's convenient that your doctor has a cell phone, but
you can pay
a health price for this access: The cell phone can be a host
Acinetobacter baumannii, a stubborn germ that can become resistant
most antibiotic types, and to survive on objects for a long
That's what was found in a new israeli study which was done
Medical Center, the head of the study was Dr. Jakob Gilad. The
found on 12% of the mobile phones and on 24% of the 71 doctors
nurses hands. This in spite of the fact that the cellular phone
banned in all the hospitals because it interferes monitors and
It was found that 10% of these germs were resistant to the strongest
antibiotics. The risk that healthy people will be infected and
is low, but the germ can be fatal for people who are very sick
or have a
weak immune system. According to Dr. Gilad, doctors can use
they simply wash hands before and after they use it."
Doctors' Mobile Phones put hospitalized at risk, By Liat Mashat-Prism
Supplement "Only Health" in Yediot Ahronot 12/10/2003.
Informant: Iris Atzmon
Brundtland on RF radiation
I heard Gro Brundtland (recently resigned director-general of
a few weeks ago and asked her if she thought that RF radiation
threat to public health. She responded with the story of how
sensitized (from an arcing microwave oven at close range which
her eyes) to cell phone radiation (she now gets headaches when
proximity). She said she knew that it was difficult to get clear
evidence from the studies yet, but from personal experience
she knows it
can affect humans. She expressed concern about sensitive people
about what might happen in the future to the youth who are using
phones now. I am trying to get an opportunity to hear
the tape of her
lecture on global health threats in which she answered this
order to get her exact quotes.
The Dutch 3G paper was interesting. Note they published it themselves
it isn't in the "official peer reviewed literature", despite
being quite well peer-reviewed. That also happened to Kjell
al's big Swedish/Norwegian National Institute of Working Life
publication a few years ago. Despite it being reviewed by Repacholi,
Swicord, and many other leading researchers it isn't in the
peer reviewed literature".
The response at 1 V/m does not surprise me. We have been extensively
experimenting with shielding bedrooms and beds from GSM microwaves
in one case the shielding material we used worked brilliantly
(down from 1 to 2 V/m to about 0.02 V/m) but broke down due
manufacture. The woman slept well for the first few weeks but
it was gradually getting worse. We dismissed it (it was not
visit) and she eventually said it had become almost useless.
went back and revisted her and she was proved right (despite
previous, incorrect, re-assurances!) and the signal strength
was up to
about 0.7 to 1 V/m again - at that was badly disturbing her
WHO is in bed with the power and cellular phone industries.
There was a
two-day international workshop meeting organised by the UK NRPB,
and ICNIRP in September 1998 on "Exposure Metrics and Dosimetry
Epidemiology". I repeatedly asked to attend but was told that
wasn't room and it was only for very senior international researchers.
When the proceedings were published in Radiation Protection
Vol 83 Nos1-2, 1999, (a special edition), it was clear that
have been space as there were only 49 attendees in the NRPB
venue that can hold in excess of 100. Within this 49 there were:
Basile, Vice President of the US CTIA and a non-scientist, many
personel (power and telecoms) including Tony Weiner from T-Mobile
also a non-scientist.
Note this "Public Science Meeting" was paid for by: Mobile Manufacturers
Forum (Alcatel, Ericsson, Mitsubishi, Motorola, and Nokia),
The GSM MoU
Association, and National Grid Company plc, UK.
Also for the WHO precautionary meeting held last February in
I asked for a representative to attend, but was told "we already
our activist" (Eva Marsalek - and Mike Repacholi would not tell
they came to select her . . . . ). Anyway kicked up quite
a fuss in
ways they found difficult to resist and they eventually (and
allowed Prof Mike O'Carroll to attend as our representative
expense, of course).
Now Mike Dolan, who is a lawyer and heads up the UK Mobile Operators
Association and John Swanson who has long worked for UK National
were allowed to attend as "observers" - but, when there, were
the right to participate fully on equal terms with the independent
scientific delegates. In fact their input was both considered
helpful, but the PROCESS was inappropriate and shielded from
Enough said about WHO, ICNIRP and NRPB and their allegiances.
The crap BrJCancer paper by Lloyd et al a couple on months ago
carried out at the UK NRPB and the CONTROLS were subject to
up to 1
microtesla 50 Hz field from flux leakage and from incomplete
cancellation in the reverse phased coils they used around the
It should have never got past peer review – whoever reviewed
either ignorant or incompetent or wanting to publish a negative
effects paper. We are formally complaining about BrJCan and
own it. This is the second time the BrJCan editor has added
"powerlines cleared of leukaemia" comment and press release
paper that was not even related to powerlines. The Llloyd research
field strengths way above any environmental levels near to powerlines
should not be cited / commented on in that way.
Very best wishes
Informant: Don Maisch
Comment Dr Miguel Muntané :
The response at 1 V/m does not surprise me: Alasdair Philips's
Practical Censorship in “official” health information.
1. THE RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE?
September 1998 on "Exposure Metrics and Dosimetry for EMF Epidemiology".
I repeatedly asked to attend but was told that there wasn't
room and it
was only for very senior international researchers.
WHO precautionary meeting held last February in Luxembourg,
I asked for
a representive to attend but was told "we already have our activist"
(Eva Marsalek - and Mike Repacholi would not tell me how they
select her . . . . ).
2. Censorship in health information?: it isn't in the "official
Despite it being reviewed by Repacholi, Swicord, and many other
researchers it isn't in the "official peer reviewed literature".
3. POWER INVESTIGATED?: just 1 V/m = 0.26 microW/cm2.
The “official” power can reach 450. microW/cm2
One mobile phone can reach more the 2,250 microW/cm2 in
the hand and brain.
Sci/Tech: Facing a remote control future?
thoughts control computer
Informant: Robert Riedlinger
of the World
Informant: George Paxinos
Not just warmer: it's the hottest for 2,000 years
America's Environmental Decline
Informant: Jean Hudon
Dominance and its Dilemmas
Informant: Sunil K. Sharma
Bush officials bend Iraq facts till they break
Iraq's Mysterious Invisible Weapons
From Information Clearing House
Old ghosts resurface to haunt UK government
Informant: Michael Kerjman
UN in, US out
Kucinich's Plan to Bring Our Troops Home
Many soldiers, same letter
Informant: Flyby News
Informant: Thomas L. Knapp
Halliburton Contracts in Iraq Inflame Unemployed Civilians
If you want our (normally daily) Newsletter in German, sometimes
partially in English, please go to
Note: EMF-Omega News belongs to the Buergerwelle Germany (incorporated
society), Umbrella Organization of the Citizens and Initiatives
for the Protection before Electrosmog.
Editor and responsible for the content: Citizens’ Initiative Omega,
member in the Buergerwelle. Buergerwelle Germany (incorporated society),
which works on non-profit base. Our messages are the result of many
hours of daily research, roundup and editing. If you would like
to support our activity for people around the world with a donation
or an aid fund unique or on regular base, you can do it: Recipient:
Buergerwelle Germany (incorporated society), bank-connection: Hypo
Bank Augsburg, account-No 2250284, BLZ 720 200 70.
Buergerwelle Germany (incorporated society), Umbrella Organization
of the Citizens and Initiatives for the Protection before Electrosmog:
Chairman Siegfried Zwerenz, 2. Chairman Barbara Eidling, Mailing
address: Lindenweg 10, D-95643 Tirschenreuth, phone 0049-(0)9631-795736,
fax 0049-(0)9631-795734, e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org, Internet http://www.buergerwelle.de
, information phone: Barbara Eidling phone 0049-(0)8171-18898 Thank
If you have informations which you would like to share with your
friends and colleges around the world and which are from common
interest, please send us this informations, we will send them out.
Disclaimer: The informations
contained in our EMF-Omega-News are derived from sources, which
we believe to be accurate but is not guaranteed.
Citizens' Initiative Omega is not responsible for any errors or
omissions and disclaims any liability incurred as a consequence
of any of the contents of this resources.