Source: <http://larouchepub.com/eirtoc/2005/eirtoc_3228.html>
This
article appears in the July 15,
2005 issue of Executive Intelligence Review.
The Plame Affair:
Rove and Cheney Are Guilty As Charged
by Jeffrey Steinberg
Within the next
days or weeks, it is anticipated that Independent Counsel Patrick
Fitzgerald will ask a Federal grand jury to hand down indictments
against one or more senior White House officials, for obstruction of
justice, perjury, and, perhaps, violation of national security laws
banning the public disclosure of the identities of American undercover
agents. The two names that have surfaced most prominently in the
two-year old probe are White House Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove and
Vice Presidential Chief of Staff I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby. The scandal
unavoidably tars Vice President Dick Cheney and President George W.
Bush.
While White House
spin-meisters have attempted, for two years, to create a fog of
confusion and disinformation about the exposure of the wife of former
U.S. Ambassador Joseph Wilson, Valerie Plame, as a CIA officer, in a
syndicated column by Robert Novak, the essential facts of the case are
straightforward and undisputed.
1. In February
2002, former Ambassador Wilson was dispatched to Niger by the CIA, to
assess raw intelligence reports, received by the Bush Administration
from Italian government sources, that in the 1990s, Saddam Hussein had
attempted to purchase large quantities of "yellowcake" uranium
compound, for the purpose of building nuclear bombs. The Wilson mission
was provoked by a request from Vice President Cheney, who was keen to
have the information corroborated, as it would bolster the case for war
on Iraq. Cheney directed his CIA briefer to seek confirmation of the
information, and the CIA then decided to send someone to Niger to
pursue the story.
Wilson had served
as a diplomat in Niger, and later as the head of African Affairs at the
National Security Council; and was the last American chargé d'affairs
in Baghdad, just prior to Operation Desert Storm in 1991.
At the conclusion
of his eight-day fact-finding mission, Wilson reported back to both the
State Department and the CIA that, based on a dozen interviews with
current and former Niger government officials and businessmen involved
in the country's tightly regulated uranium industry, he concluded that
the story was false.
2. Despite his
findings—which were buttressed by similar reports from the U.S.
Ambassador in Niger and from a Marine general who had been dispatched
on a parallel mission by the Pentagon—in September 2002, the Bush
Administration and the British government of Tony Blair claimed
publicly that Saddam had attempted to purchase large quantities of
uranium from Africa.
On Dec. 19, 2002,
in response to Iraqi government written disclosures about their weapons
programs, the U.S. State Department issued a fact sheet, asserting that
Saddam had covered up efforts to obtain 500 tons of yellowcake from
Niger, in his UN disclosures.
In his January
2003 State of the Union address, President Bush, citing British
intelligence reports, claimed that Iraq had attempted to obtain uranium
from Africa.
3. On the eve of
the U.S. invasion of Iraq, on March 7, 2003, Dr. Mohammed ElBaradei,
the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), testified
before the United Nations Security Council. Dr. ElBaradei not only
reported that his inspectors in Iraq had found no evidence of any
illegal nuclear weapons program; his staff had also determined that the
alleged Niger government "yellowcake" documents were shoddy forgeries.
4. The next day,
March 8, 2003, Joseph Wilson appeared on CNN, and stated, "I think it's
safe to say that the U.S. government should have or did know that this
report was a fake before Dr. ElBaradei mentioned it in his report at
the UN yesterday." Wilson made no mention of his Niger fact-finding
mission.
5. According to
well-placed U.S. government sources, within days of Wilson's appearance
on CNN, a meeting took place in the Office of Dick Cheney, to review
the Wilson statements, and work up a dossier on the former Ambassador.
6. On May 6, 2003,
Nicholas Kristof wrote a New York Times column, "Missing In
Action: Truth," which revealed the existence of the CIA fact-finding
mission to Niger in February 2002, without mentioning Wilson's name.
7. On July 6,
2003, Wilson wrote an op-ed, "What I Didn't Find in Africa," which was
published in the New York Times, detailing his mission to
Niger, and identifying Cheney as the source of the query to the CIA
that led to his mission. Wilson asked: "Did the Bush Administration
manipulate intelligence about Saddam Hussein's weapons program to
justify an invasion of Iraq?"
8. On July 14,
2003, Chicago Sun-Times syndicated columnist Robert Novak wrote
a widely published article, exposing Ambassador Wilson's wife, Valerie
Plame, as a CIA officer, involved in tracking weapons of mass
destruction. The Novak column aimed to discredit Wilson, by charging
that he was sent to Niger only because his wife recommended him for the
assignment. Novak quoted several "senior Administration officials" as
his sources.
According to a
report in the Washington Post on Sept. 28, 2003, when Novak
called a CIA official, to alert him in advance that he planned to "out"
Valerie Plame as a CIA officer, the official urged him not to print it
"for security reasons." In the Post article, Novak acknowledged
that the CIA had specifically asked him not to name her. "They said
it's doubtful she'll ever again have a foreign assignment," he admitted.
Under the
Intelligence Identity Protection Act of 1982, it is a Federal crime,
punishable by a fine and up to ten years in prison, to knowingly
disclose the identity of a U.S. undercover operative. Under other far
broader Federal statutes, it is a crime to disclose classified
information, damaging to the national security.
9. Presidential
Advisor Karl Rove was deeply implicated from the outset. While there is
no public evidence to date that Rove personally contacted Novak to
specifically reveal Plame's identity, several journalists have reported
that they were contacted by Rove, soon after the publication of the
Novak leak, and were told that "Joe Wilson's wife is fair game." At
least six journalists, including Novak, were contacted by Rove and
encouraged to target Wilson and Plame.
10. Independent
Counsel Fitzgerald has also identified "Scooter" Libby as another
"senior Administration official" who contacted journalists and
discussed the Wilson/Plame issue, both before and after the appearance
of the Novak column.
Worse Than
Watergate
John
Dean, Richard Nixon's White House General Counsel, has denounced the
Wilson-Plame affair as "worse than Watergate." He is right. Not only
did the Novak column, orchestrated from the White House, end Valerie
Plame's 20-year career as a CIA "non-official cover" officer. The leak
also exposed a longstanding CIA proprietary company, Brewster Jennings
& Associates, where Plame worked. The Boston- and Washington-based
front company had, since 1994, been tracking weapons of mass
destruction, through a network of agents and correspondents in a such
dangerous places as Iran, North Korea, Belarus, Israel, Pakistan,
Libya, Serbia and Taiwan.
It is not known
whether the CIA or one of the Congressional intelligence oversight
panels has done a full damage assessment of the consequences of the
Plame leak. But they are no doubt extensive. It is one thing for a spy,
like Aldrich Ames, Robert Hanssen, or Jonathan Jay Pollard, to steal
secrets jeopardizing the national security of the United States on
behalf of a foreign power. It is another thing altogether, for top
officials of the White House to willfully leak the identity of an
undercover CIA officer, as an act of revenge or damage control, against
a U.S. official who came forward to reveal government chicanery in a
matter as serious as the Iraq War.
The Chickens Are
Coming Home to Roost
The
pivotal role of Lewis Libby sets the stage for the impeachment or
forced resignation of the Vice President. This, Lyndon LaRouche has
emphasized, is a precondition for any effective U.S. government
response to the onrushing global financial meltdown. The reason to
force Cheney's resignation is not just the Plame leak, which emanated
from his office; however, the involvement of Libby, along with other
Cheney staffers, including John Hannah, in the orchestrated destruction
of Wilson, Plame, and the Brewster Jennings proprietary, affords a
sufficient cause for Cheney's impeachment.
Cheney's
departure, and replacement by a qualified, experienced figure, such as
several leading Republican Senators, would create the safe conditions
for the removal of President George W. Bush, for the good of the nation.
Procedures for the
removal of Bush from office are contained in the 25th Amendment to the
Constitution, which spells out the procedures for the removal of the
President from office if he is determined to be "unable to discharge
the powers and duties of his office." The Constitution itself demands
that the President meet the standard of competence. And that is where
Bush fails, miserably.
Bush has
demonstrated, with increasing frequency in recent weeks, that he is
unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. LaRouche has
pointed to the President's oft-repeated declarations that the U.S.
Treasury bonds on deposit in the Social Security Trust Fund are
"useless IOUs," as evidence that he is no longer qualified to discharge
his duties as President. Such cavalier declarations of a sovereign
default on the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, alone,
constitute an act of political insanity and incompetence, that prove
his incompetence to serve. As the United States and the world move into
the most deadly systemic financial and economic crisis in modern
times—as early as this Summer—the question must be asked: Can the
nation survive a continuation of the Bush-Cheney Presidency?
|